There's one thing about knowing high strength = good, bro. We all know that.
My belief is he was tipped to know that 100 strength would win you dice roll after dice roll....endless -10 holding penalties on you etc. Every game vs. Bryson played the same and was disgusting.
There's one thing about knowing high strength = good, bro. We all know that.
My belief is he was tipped to know that 100 strength would win you dice roll after dice roll....endless -10 holding penalties on you etc. Every game vs. Bryson played the same and was disgusting.
I get what you mean, even if I don't agree with that.
I never knew that when I drafted players, I just looked for guys with high enough physical attributes that if they boomed it worked. In PFL I don't think my o-line has any 100 strengthers. DTs I'm close there.
Honestly, this has been a LONG time coming. I really don't feel it will changes things all that much to be honest. I've been preferring the 3-4 defenses more recently anyway. Might be time to find a new coach this coming offseason (for XFL).
Honestly, this has been a LONG time coming. I really don't feel it will changes things all that much to be honest. I've been preferring the 3-4 defenses more recently anyway. Might be time to find a new coach this coming offseason (for XFL).
That it has. I welcome the change (even if how it arose I am not personally a fan of), but I will agree with what you said, not insofar as 3-4 defense but I expect gameplans won't change significantly.
There is still a minor bug with the fact that certain zone plays can't be overused + you can't get familiarity on them, but since none of those plays are OP, it is a lot better.