You have 2 owners, let's call them owner A & owner B.
For the sake of arguement....let's say owner A & B have played 59 seasons together in 12 different active leagues dating back 5 years in real time.
Owner A 59 seasons 53 postseason 21 Conference Championships 13 League Championships 35-37 (overall record vs B) 22-27 (regular season record vs B) 13-10 (postseason record vs B)
Owner B 59 seasons 17 Conference Championships 9 League Championships 37-35 (overall record vs A) 27-22 (regular season record vs A) 10-13 (postseason record vs A)
Which owner is better?
Is owner A better because of his postseason success?
Is owner B better because of his overall record advantage?
Or is it too close to call and you would say the 2 owners are equally matched?