dangalanti wrote:
Cjfred68 wrote:
I never see the need to draft them high or overpay for any 5 year vets that hit free agency
NOW you tell me after I just spent a first round pick here on an o lineman - lol
But seriously, I have noticed that you and smirt both aim for the 100 blocking vets instead of the 26 year old 98 strength 80 blocking guys.
I know speed kills on the d line, but I guess just throw strength totally out the window? Duane's team in the other league also has a top o line, so I didn't know if the 85 speed 63 strength DE would be able to get past a top tackle. From this discussion I'm guessing you aim for 100 pass/run d linemen if they're fast enough? Without giving away too many secrets, do you have a floor for tackling skills?
Like strength....I'm not high on the tackle ability either....sure a high tackle attribute guy will have fewer missed tackles over the course of a season but speed gets a defender to the ball which is over half the battle at least IMO.
So a MLB with 60 speed and 100 tackle versus a MLB with 80 speed and 60 tackle...who are you taking???
I'm taking the 80 speed MLB everytime.
BTW
I didn't say I NEVER draft OL or DL in the 1st round....just rarely. There is something to be said for drafting an OL high if he is miles better then anything else available...If he booms....thats like a dozen seasons where you don't have to worry about 1 slot on the line.
AND!!!!
That's just my style of playing...I've seen owners who invest heavily into their OL and have success. It's important to remember that their are different paths to success...take Smirt & me....we have different styles but we both have our fair share of success